Kaspersky vs Mcaffe and Symantec

[Security]

I have learned that there is a vast difference between the ability for Kaspersky to keep my anti spam and anti virus updated versus McAffe and Symantec. I was wondering if other feels that there is a difference between capability and hype.

[sh0ck]

There is a big difference. Symantec have gone down the drain lately, McAfee is pretty good, as is Kaspersky.

[lareneg]

From my experience, Norton is good when it comes to protecting the system, but takes much of the system resources...

[lxserverdirect]

i recommend mcafee

[fdcservers]

I just got Kaspersky and I like it but I do not notice less spam

[smithkarl]

Hi,

Well to fight spam I use Gmail free account. It is great.

Though I tried Mcaffe and it is a bit slow somtimes so I got bored and switched with Avast free. It worked great and I still use it now for more than 7 months.

Updates occure very regularly and they have their online forum as well for help.

Karl

[tordex]

they are just resource eater scumbags.
ESET NOD32 for me,its the best antivirus anti-spyware software available till date.

[nullnet]

id say kaspersky

[ReliableServers]

Check out trend micro

[kennith]

im using bitdefender now.
i've used TM, Panda and Mcaffee before but they use up system resources. i think there is a promotion for 2 pc and 2 yrs license all for the price of 1.
tks