[nikky]

Razorservers.com offers Windows 2003 and 2008 on their managed dedicated servers.
Can anybody tell me which one is better to start from?
What is the difference between them?

[FortressDewey]

It's going to depend on what you are doing, most of my sales tend to be 03 as it is more stable.

[arguss]

If I'm not mistaken Serverpoint.com offers also Windows 2003 and 2008 and their prices are low. They provide their services on professional level and hope their services will be good for you.

[romas]

I think that first of all you should broaden your search and then compare the companies' offers. As for recommendation, have a look at webintellects.com 100% fully managed dedicated servers. So, choose the best one for you.

[ConnectSwitch]

My advice is to stay with 2003 for the time being for a year at least. Just untill 2008 is more established and stable like 2003

[SiberForum]

Originally Posted by nikky Razorservers.com offers Windows 2003 and 2008 on their managed dedicated servers. Can anybody tell me which one is better to start from? What is the difference between them?

03 is most stable. But all depend on what you are looking to host with them.

[intri_ga]

If razorservers.com offers both versions of Windows, they must be responsible for their uninterrupted performance.
As I know them to be a reliable and stable company, think you will not have issues using their services.

[NeverSTOP]

Windows 2003 is stable and proved to be a reliable OS.
If you ask me, I'd use Windows 2003 from Razorservers.com.

[redwood]

Well, after I have made a comparison from the mentioned recommendations, I have to tell you that webintellects.com offers more better hosting solutions as there are so many useful features and the price is competitive. So if I were you, my choice would be this company.

[SiberForum]

Guys I suppose that the question was what is better, not which web host is the best.